upvote
I never mentioned cheating? Not sure why are you bringing it up.

I said that the missteps was having sex with subordinates and chinese spies.

Now start connecting the dots with Nvidia being one of the major advocates for relaxing exports to China and selling billions of GPUs to shady Singaporean companies that the chinese spy represented and you understand why the board finds him a liability.

reply
You mentioned, as the first big point:

"Having sex with your workers and chinese spies is obviously not the kind of behavior that reflects that."

Fair though you didn't say cheating, but it undermined (at least by reading it) the main argument you brought up later regarding chinese spies

reply
Even the "chinese spies" is just unsubstantiated 'she's chinese so she should be a spy". She's not even chinese iirc, isn't she singaporean? so it's like suspect by ethnicity.
reply
> so it's like suspect by ethnicity.

Suspect by payment from ... TenCent? AFAIK. Her company got money from Tencent and after every longer meeting with Jensen, someone from Tencent flew in and had a meeting with her. At least that is what I remember hearing.

reply
In Wikipedia no mention of TenCent at all. In another writeup it's mentioned, but nothing clear.

Was Alice's company supposed to be the only company getting Nvidia chips (which they deny doing anyway). Or one of many and Chinese companies did it with many different others?

If many, why is her relationship specifically important or special from that aspect?

Again, I can understand snooping for confidential early information from him. But "she got with him so that this single company gets chips"?

reply
If, as a CEO, the location and interaction of your penis ever becomes well known, then you are failing as a CEO, outside of a few very specific cases.
reply