upvote
It’s the wrong way by having a neutered market leader instead of strengthened competitors.
reply
Efficiency is a great thing and long term what’s needed so we can buy laptops again at a reasonable price. There will be a pretty large blast radius across ANT/OAI/ORCL/SPCX/TSMC/neoclouds. Prob 15T of market value at risk and the flywheel of investment which is conditioned on investors and the economy believing they have durable appreciation locked up in AI stocks (“if my basket of investments is safe, I’m willing to invest my next dollar in more of it” vs “the sky is falling and I need to tighten the belt / pull money out”). I’m trying not to be a doomer here as I think it’s somewhere in the middle it’s just very frothy and the upside scenarios generally envisioned NVDA to be stable
reply
I will be honest, my personal opinion is keep the blood flowing until RAM prices return to Sept 2025 levels.

This whole saga has been a ridiculous waste of everybody's time and energy. There's no compelling argument that points to these new innovations not otherwise happening if RAM prices weren't artificially inflated by the fever dream of private equity.

reply
How is nvidia crashing out going to reduce RAM prices?

The demand for high-ram consumption applications is higher than ever and rising. That demand is not created by nvidia, but nvidia's customers. nvidia's customers are buying nvidia parts built with other's ram because they have customers renting the compute.

Whoever nvidia is buying ram from will simply sell to the next highest bidder, and the ram will still be sold out through the coming years.

reply
Because Nvidia is personally investing in a huge amount of those customers, enabling the hyperscaling. If half of the circle breaks, the other half does too.
reply
> if RAM prices weren't artificially inflated by the fever dream of private equity.

RAM prices are a result of skyrocketing demand. That's hardly a fever dream.

You can hardly blame RAM suppliers for taking the money of people who are coming to them begging to pay more than the person before them in line. It's not like they are squeezing the market in some cartel price-fixing racket.It's the customers who are willing trying to pay more for better access. The innovations and the price of RAM are so non-sequitur at this point; I can't understand what point you're making. Sure, if RAM were as easy to get as the circuit boards they're being put on, innovation would be the same (or accelerated!) but that doesn't have anything to do with the fact that RAM is incredibly supply constrained and ramping production to meet the demand of a seemingly insatiable market takes a long time for a product this complicated and specialized.

If any of the manufacturing companies could have seen this coming, they'd have started ramping production to insane levels 5 years ago, and they'd be taking in just as much money as Nvidia is.

reply
Agreed. We all want a soft landing.
reply
It’s not a given that markets are able to navigate the risk between massive capital investment and unknown future revenues. Everyone is trying to figure out the long term value from AI. For a made up numbers example the path might require $1T investment to unlock $10T revenue in 10 years from now. But if no one can put up the $1T it stalls and doesn’t happen next decade
reply
Spot on
reply
The hardware is expensive because it's supply constrained. Demand far exceeds supply.

Harming Nvidia would only make us more compute constrained, and raise prices further.

It seems it's impossible to get a certain type of person to understand this regardless of whether it's housing, education or chips.

Harming the producers of [thing] or disincentivizing profits will not make [thing] cheaper if demand remains the same (or if it is growing, like in all of the areas I mentioned).

reply
> It seems it's impossible to get a certain type of person to understand this regardless of whether it's housing, education or chips.

What type of person are you referring to?

reply
Have you ever considered that an efficient economy is you paying everything you have for food and living in absolute poverty
reply