upvote
I noticed that Apple has been updating their documentation so developers can have less back and forth when releasing an app.

Apple has anti-spam app policies that basically limit innovation and competition in certain product categories. An extreme example would be Apple not allowing any more "sleep music apps" b/c there is enough in the store.

An investor actually approached me about buying a couple mobile apps I made b/c they are "aged" and don't need to go through the rigorous first-review approval process

reply
> what Apple can do

A lot, they _can_ do almost whatever they want with their own AppStore and own business model. Including making good on the anti-trust lawsuit they've got for a decade around the world and let go of their monopoly.

We shouldn't make it sound like they _have to be_ the bad guys. Even from a business standpoint they're slowly losing the grip on their market and getting back some goodwill wouldn't be a bad thing.

reply
They can hire more reviewers - they say they only have 500, that's the same number they had in 2020 when the Epic judge called them out for it.
reply
And makes around $10,000,000,000 per year off the app store: https://techcrunch.com/2025/05/08/appfigures-apple-made-over...

They can absolutely afford to hire more.

reply
They will not. Why would high revenue be a reason to hire more?

They look at margins and they want to optimize them, not use better margins as a reason to pursue smaller margins. Small time indie developers and businesses that earn them less than millions a month in fees are not worth their time. They’re solving this by automating more telemetry, not by hiring more junior and senior reviewers. They don’t want to take a loss on small devs.

Only way they change course is via regulations.

reply
Allow third party app stores.
reply
They are the richest company in the world worth trillions.

You're not sure what they can do?

1) hire more people 2) let people buy apps from wherever they want.

reply
Why do people think rich businesses will spend more? They protect their margins. Companies don’t earn more to spend more of their margin.

Only way to get what we want from Apple is regulation.

reply
I don't think they will spend more. I think they will spend less. The can spend more, is the answer to OP question
reply
> I'm not sure what Apple can do here;

Hire more reviewers. Apple is making a shitload of money from App Store sales (and of course by scamming its users in many creative ways). They'd better spend it on making developers happier, not on thickening the walls of their garden.

reply
They don’t make a shitload off the small apps like the synthesizer from this post. They aren’t going to introduce more expensive Cupertino and Cork reviewers to help that category of dev. They’re a business and will automate instead of have small time earners occupy more time on reviewer desks.
reply
it's not just Apple. Steam game review is now taking weeks due to the amount of AI slop being published, whereas before it was 3-5 days.

I'm not sure how platforms will handle this honestly. Of course they want to curate a bit and avoid blatant malware/spam, though.

reply
Even just internal Steamworks requests are taking 3-5x as long.
reply
In both of these cases the platforms are absurdly profitable, 75% profit margin for Apple, fleet of mega-yachts for Steam, the solution is they stop skimping on review and hire more people to keep up.
reply
$1000 application fee would probably thin the herd.
reply