The post was about their uptime. How is this relevant.
replyEven if it vaguely is, why do people think subjective anecdotal thoughts about which model is better are a good discussion topic. If there’s an objective evaluation idea that would be useful.
I run evals for a very specific domain. Opus 5.5 is still the industry leader (we can’t use Fable class yet).
> How is this relevant.
replyIt's relevant because there's only so many "yep it's down" comments that are interesting. They have a technology problem which isn't fixed. They're about to go IPO. Their marketing is clearly still working, but subjective experience with both contradicts the marketing.
> I run evals for a very specific domain.
What do your evals test for?
We come here to share our experiences with tech so yeah it is relevant. His anecdotes are just as valid as yours.
replyLet's just post company names as title then, so people talk about whatever problem they have with the it, not the thread topic.
replyI mean, yeah I agree. Claude is a condescending experience
replyAnthropic's products appeal to a certain kind of audience. This is all very much as intended.
replymanager thinking
replyyou'd rather have a subject that does exactly as told, or that does what's right?