upvote

points

by js811 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby forshaper8 hours ago|
next
[-]
Innovation relies on bigger groups, which then allows a smaller portion of the population to do more.
reply
upvoteby jpadkins6 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
While I tend to agree with you, I find the Japanese are incredibly innovative and they are not growing. Maybe I should look at the rate of innovation and see if that has stalled out with population growth?
reply
upvoteby nradov5 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Which major disruptive innovations have come out of Japan lately?
reply
upvoteby jpadkins3 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Not major disruptive innovations, but the gadgets that do all kinds of little quality of life things. They have innovative solutions to so many of the small things in life. And a society where you can invent and bring to market quirky little products that do cool stuff.
reply
upvoteby jimbokun5 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Perhaps.

To me it feels like their most rapid period of innovation was post World War II as the population was growing very rapidly.

reply
upvoteby convolvatron5 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
I have heard this before...in what sense would adding population result in more innovation rather than having a more supportive environment for the people we already have (healthcare, education, financing, etc).
reply
upvoteby forshaper2 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Simply more nodes for experiences to bounce through, so long as they have ways to communicate enough to copy, recombine, and incrementally improve on their activity. The more people copying, recombining, and improving on stuff, the more innovation.

Often easier to consider this in terms of competitive sports, though you could check seshatdb or something to see if it holds at scale. For example, YouTube really changed a lot with sports.

reply
upvoteby ertian4 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
You figure our society is "increasingly extractive and unequal"? That may be true relative to post-WW2 America, but on a larger scale--either historically or geographically--can you really hold that modern society is more extractive and unequal than slave societies, serfdoms, and empires of the past?

Honestly, population growth has, if anything, correlated to increasingly equal and egalitarian societies.

reply
upvoteby dotancohen3 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]

  > has, if anything, correlated
This phrasing is delicate. Correlated, but likely not caused by nor a cause of. Just two things that happened in parallel.

To be clear, I am agreeing with you.

reply
upvoteby RobotToaster2 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Wealth inequality in the USA today is worse than 1789 France https://populareconomics.substack.com/p/is-wealth-inequality...
reply