upvote
In my experience, Matter is okay except that it’s built over IP and manufacturers seem to be unable to resist using that juicy IP connection to talk to the Internet.

Thread should not have allowed Internet connectivity by default.

reply
My Brighter lamps don't connect to the internet. But, the smart features don't work properly, so maybe they're just shot in general.
reply
(Not the OP, but want to spread awareness, sorry.) The Wikipedia page already lists the greatest disadvantage:

> (..) the ability to commission a finished product into a Matter network in the field mandates certification and membership fees, entailing both one-time, recurring, and per-product costs. This is enforced using a public key infrastructure (PKI) and so-called device attestation certificates.

Matter is designed to necessitate phoning into the internet for certification, which allows all manufacturers to just easily add-in phoning into the internet for telemetry. Furthermore, it does not define exactly which functionality must remain if a device is disconnected from the internet for a long time (assuming the user is trying to avoid sending out telemetry, not even bypassing certification).

reply
The Matter devices (a smart bulb or a sensor) have no Internet access required by the spec, and no way to send telemetry to the Internet.

It’s the commissioners that check for the certification: your phone or an open source implementation.

And the commissioners can, explicitly by the specification, commission other devices while completely offline.

reply
> The Matter devices (a smart bulb or a sensor) have no Internet access required by the spec, and no way to send telemetry to the Internet.

That's a little disingenuous... All Matter-over-WiFi devices inherently have Internet access unless you're blocking it through router policy, and most Matter-over-Thread border routers commercially available today give Thread devices Internet access by default if they want it (to avoid this you need to self-host your own OTBR instance).

reply