upvote
Players do usually draw a line, individually. Because you have to develop technique and composition around these things and that has time/flexibility/practicality costs in various ways.

For example it's not difficult to see with this thing how you can end up with arrangements that can only be played on this one modified instrument (which means as a gigging musician you probably need two of them!)

But also you have to spend the time developing the technique to use this thing, which might have impacts on your technique elsewhere.

The Duesenberg Multibender is a great example of this. It's a configurable bridge where separate levers can be configured to bend (usually bend up but with a hefty return spring they can be made to bend down) individual strings by differing amounts, which lets you can achieve voicings that sound like pedal steel instruments. (It's really cool.)

So that is possibly good if you are a pedal steel player but you want a portable lap instrument that has some of those bends for the only couple of pieces where they are needed, or you are a guitarist who has to play a couple of pieces that have pedal-steel bends in them and you don't want to buy a pedal steel.

But it has a cost: configuring the multibender takes time and the levers can only be used with the intervals they were configured for — indeed, if you configure the levers to bend strings down, you are possibly stuck in a single tuning.

It also changes the way musicians play; it's clear that compositions get written around the multibender. So it is, at that point, a somewhat different instrument to learn to really use, which takes time.

There are other ways to approximate some of the bends these levers can do — you can bend the string behind the bar with your finger, you can combine that with sliding the bar up a fret for a shifted pair of notes that match the typical bends (albeit without easy access to unshifted strings), or you can slant the bar, which has its own classic tone. These also need learning, and they have their own limitations (there's kind of only one lap steel capo that can survive string bends and return to tuning)

So for a player, the decision to use, or not use, these extra facilities is a meaningful decision in terms of how they want to sound, how much time they want to spend learning one technique over another, whether they want to compose around those facilities, etc.

(FWIW I would love one and could build a lap steel around one, but I have deliberately chosen to focus my learning attention and playing style on other techniques first)

It's pretty much the same with guitars — a lot of players decide early on that they are going to be fixed-bridge players or whammy bar players. They become quite different instrumentalists as a result.

reply
Thanks for the further explanation, that makes more sense. From your original comment, it sounded like you were softly arguing against modifying instruments universally, to protect the sanctity of their instrumenthood or somesuch, but yes, there are plenty of reasons one might want to keep things 'vanilla' too.
reply
> it sounded like you were softly arguing against modifying instruments universally,

Oh, no, not at all. I just feel that sometimes eliminating constraints is not the right choice; there's sort of a tension between freedom and focus/clarity etc.

ETA: though on further thought, the question of their instrumenthood is in there at some level, I must concede. But it is quite a complex notion.

e.g. is a fully chromatic mountain dulcimer still really a mountain dulcimer? To what extent is an instrument indivisible from its canon/repertoire?

Certain classic pieces of folk music may never have evolved if the early instrument had more freedom to fret more notes, because an entire style of playing the dulcimer (the "noter" style where you fret with a small stick) really is rather interwoven with the diatonic layout.

Like I say — there's no hard answer but I think this is a question musicians often grapple with as they develop their talent more deeply. In the same way that a lot of guitarists at the top of their ability abandon a lot of the anciliary kit (effects pedals, particular instruments) and strip back.

In the AI era I spend quite a lot of time thinking about creativity and constraints, but it has always been fascinating to me.

reply
It doesn't sound like that at all, you're just reading it in bad faith and being deliberately argumentative.
reply
No, it's a fair enough interpretation.
reply