upvote
I have an FM-1, and it's definitely a fun device for the price and worth having just to putz around while sitting on the couch. However, I don't think it's the easiest way to get started creating music. I personally have gotten much more value out of a DAW like FL Studio. I've tried to go DAWless (groove boxes, samplers, trackers, etc), but I always end up back in FL Studio.
reply
I have one, too. I think the groovebox firmwares are fun for sketching out ideas. Some people create fully developed songs, but I don’t know, I think the more targeted firmwares are more interesting.

Firmware like Obervave, Hortator, X0X, and FMini-1, with their limited scope and greater depth I find to be more useful, at least as part of a bigger workflow.

reply
If the OP is a software developer it's actually helpful to download a custom firmware's source code and have an LLM teach you how to use the firmware to play music and learn music theory at the same time, on one of the groove boxes.

E.g. it'll tell you how to activate the arpeggiator, as well as what an arpeggio is, what notes comprise each chord, scales, etc, which are all programmed into the firmware.

reply
Grooveboxes can't really do anything that you haven't been able to do for 15 years with internet resources and pirated FL Studio (other DAWs are available). The main value is having a break from the computer & physical knobs to twiddle. If you value time away from the computer, something like Korg M01[D] on the [3]DS might be worth trying since you can't spend hours tweaking synth parameters (and I imagine it's much easier to sequence on).
reply
A good groovebox doesn't have to be crippled. Yamaha did an excellent job with their QY-series, the QY-70 and QY-100 being completely fully fledged sequencers with many advanced features in addition to having very groovebox-like functionality. I feel that we have actually gone backwards in the last 20 years especially. Grooveboxes are easier to use and get going with than they used to be but lack a lot of features they used to have. Why not at least throw in a MIDI event list editor these days? But they often don't. Peak groovebox was the Yamaha RS7000, it has never been improved upon. Same basic software roots that they had in the QY series and the Yamaha sequencers you used to get in their flagship workstations before the color touch-screen era.
reply
It's all over YouTube for me too. The firmware hacking for this thing has got people hyped.

https://thefirmwarehub.com/

reply
This looks great.

How long until we get that with a native support for changing firmware?

As in: preload ten firmware versions and switch between them, with persisted state?

reply
not enough space on device

but hook your FM1 to your phone and flash from there (the firmware hub)... very portable.

i like m-pyre a lot right now - https://historyofsky.github.io/m-pyre/

reply
I'm not your demographic - committed amateur muso mostly acoustic (saxophone) with a side interest in electronic music. My seemingly sudden better understanding of the structure and uses of the diminished scale (have been looking into it on and off for a couple of years) may well coincide with the ease with which the Sloop firmware allows me to easily make interesting-to-me musical sequences. However most of my musical activities involves playing sax in medium sized or big bands. Mind you I can not understand song mode and how to save stuff yet, but that's a permanent problem I've had with every groovebox type thing I've tried.
reply
Just bought one last week of Aliexpress, totally worth the $70! Very hackable too!
reply
I haven't used an FM-1, so I can't speak to the specifics of it, but you absolutely do not need to understand music theory and improvisation to make music on something like this.

Additionally, understanding theory and improvisation is certainly a great thing to know if you're trying to make music, but you can understand a ton of things in the abstract and also be pretty terrible at applying it in the moment.

So if you want to get a device you can throw some hacked firmware on and have some fun, I'd say don't let your lack of theory hold you back.

reply
> Is this a useful device to get a feel for creating music, or is it only really useful if you already understand music theory or improvisation?

"Useful" is a really subjective word when it comes to making music in general. Some template groove on a shit keyboard could be the base for a hit song (like Gorillaz' Clint Eastwood) while others don't make stuff unless in front of a modular synth with 100% control of everything.

Any instrument can be fun without knowing music theory, as long as you're willing to trial and error for a bit, until you find what sounds good :)

reply
hello fellow youtube addict.
reply