upvote
11M really is not enough to suspect a conspiracy of this scale.

It doesn't take a genius to figure out what a shipment with an Nvidia label to a warehouse contains.

reply
Typically it's a bit harder than that as not every shipment is millions of dollars in stuff.

My father was a transportation manager for years, and his first rule is when expensive shipments are targeted and inexpensive are not it's an inside job.

reply
Not sure why my original post is downvoted, it is following all publicly available information about this case so far.

This is just one shipment of several that would have been siphoned off over the past year or two.

Oh and another fact, news of the nVidia situation got out to investors and was the source of the recent broad market sell off, even though this was all insider trading based on information that has not been released publicly.

reply
> 11M really is not enough to suspect a conspiracy of this scale.

That's how they fool the public, and people almost always take the bait. The above "$11M" is just one of many; the rest have not been discovered yet.

reply
It's sort of like ants in your kitchen.
reply
If "they" are in a position to control the narrative to this degree, then why bother disclosing the "$11M" theft at all? Why not just not report any of it, rather than artificially report about one of many and distort the value?
reply
yeah seriously, this is just a Tuesday afternoon for Ziggy Sobotka
reply
The big conspiracy is not $11m of hardware going missing in domestic US, its everyone from Jensen Huang to Trump knowing Huang's girlfriend was a Chinese spy and several mysterious shell companies with a front office that she was connected to in Singapore buying billions of dollars of chips. At least based on reporting so far.

edit : oh and possibly Lutnick and Nvidia covering it up

So perhaps there's another shoe to drop in terms of Nvidia (the DOJ case), and maybe Trump throws Lutnick under the bus when the heat piles on

reply
> Let's assume that Lutnick, Trump and even Jensen Huang were all making money on the side by using their combined involvement to bypass export controls.

Let's not, and wait for evidence instead...keeping an eye on your assumption as indeed possible.

reply
You can bet that Trump es making money in this. ([edit] not in this incident specifically, but in the whole Nvidia situation). Otherwise he’d be complaining loudly right now.
reply
The GB202 RTX 5090 was discontinued, which had 32GB of DDR7 and was subject to export controls. Coincidentally, the GB202 RTX Pro 5500, which has 84GB of DDR7 suddenly was able to be produced and is somehow compliant with the export controls.

I'm not sure how to square this against there not being some funny business with the export controls.

reply
If you are politically bypassing export controls you can ship billions of dollars of gear through normal channels. https://www.wyden.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/11122026wydenneal...

Your theory is like pointing at a story about a guy holding up a 7/11 in March 2009 and blaming it on Bernie Madoff.

reply
Bypassing export controls is not this simple. In this case, it was the commerce secretary who slow rolled enforcement, likely due to some form of quid pro quo knowing the people involved and even extending to the $25 million ballroom donation..

They had to get around other Federal oversight that was trying to enforce the export controls. Bessent clarified as much on CNBC earlier today.

reply
Still ain't nobody spending 25 million and filing false police reports to make a 7 million gain.

Someone in a food truck taking 6 pallets from a dock is a theft.

Someone currying favor to the tune of $25 million has billions to make.

reply