Correct. This document is only relevant for a particular time period in the development of AI and will not "be relevant for years to come."
reply14. We own the intent, taste, and consequences of what we ship
replyIt sounds to me like you're arguing against this point in particular.
More power to you. I'd like never to work at a place that sanctions slop-validated-slop.
This assumes that "humans owning the intent, taste, and consequences" is necessarily a good thing, and agents will necessarily do a worse job. This is not grounded in anything but vibes.
replyLOL stop it already with the agentic crap. Besides the already automation-ready software use cases, agents are simply the wrong tool for the job, unless you bend and distort the definition of such job.
Y’all fully invested in this agentic bullshit that you sound delusional and talk in self-evident truths that nobody outside of your niche SWE bubble would ever share.
replyI can't argue against you having an alternate opinion. But "humans better than ai for taste, judgement, reviews etc." is the self-serving assumption not grounded in any empirical evidence.
reply