upvote
SMART developed by ASI and the FAA is pushing to own a portion of the company:

"The FAA in June awarded Boston-based startup Air Space Intelligence a contract — worth up to $875.9 million — for an AI-powered tool to help air traffic controllers manage the nation’s skies and a related system for an FAA nerve center in northern Virginia to better handle plane congestion. The AI platform’s initial launch in the Washington area has sparked concern among Democrats in Congress who say it should be put on pause until they have a better understanding of how it’s being deployed."

"Over two dozen lawmakers have called on the FAA to pause its 90-day evaluation period for the platform, which began late last month in the Washington region. They say there’s been an “egregious lack of transparency.”"

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/10/15/faa-stake-ai-compan...

Feels like somebody was pushing their preferred company for a government contract and now is push for the government to invest.

reply
NYT: "In a social media post on Friday, the company [ASI] said, 'The current ground stop is not based on or a result of the SMART system, any product of ASI or our integration with FAA and ATC.'"
reply
Just like MS didn't fuck up outlook with AI. I'll hold judgment on what actually happened until 6 months from now.
reply
Outlook was part of a general blackout that affected many companies apart of Microsoft. It looks like a Russian ciberatack more than ai bugs
reply
Wait, the FAA wants to own a portion of the company? As in, the government believes it had the authority to own the means of production?

Is this more common than I realize in US executive deparyments and agencies?

reply
The current administration has taken govt stakes in over 40 companies. I don’t have a link handy but I believe this is unprecedented for the US.
reply
I took it to mean that somebody in government is pushing to invest public money in this private company.
reply
Invest, or spend?
reply
What do you mean? The Trump administration is the most socialist since the the 30s, seriously.The government now owns dozens of large companies and is giving individual citizens shares (with those "Trump accounts" for kids etc.)
reply
[flagged]
reply
deleted
reply
[flagged]
reply
The whole setup is worrisome.
reply
It would be super awesome if I could hop on an airplane without getting my insides x-rayed, my belongs sorted through or damaged, worrying about the windows falling off or the plane's systems flying itself into a crash, or some tech bros' bid to be a billionaire telling what an understaffed ATC controller what to do.
reply
AI tech is nowhere near reliable enough to be introduced in such important systems. I find this deeply troubling even if it’s not related to the current issue.
reply
We can use Chinese models? (I am referring to the LLMs).
reply
Personally I fail to understand how we could possibly benefit from a non-deterministic AI system, when normal computer systems are more than capable of managing a 3-dimensional airspace using nothing but basic math. Smells like pork for sure :/
reply
Curious where the people are who said AI will be doing x in y months (for their valuations) - it never will. Where are they hiding?
reply
From the very first line of that article:

> The FAA has reassured the public and airlines that SMART only suggests routes and doesn't affect air safety.

reply
Sure, but the tool needs to get information from the communication systems, and if it's badly written maybe it could overload some system components.

That's just a scenario off the top of my head, it could be a lot of stuff. Plugging something new into an old, complicated system isn't risk free.

reply
That would make me feel better if we could trust a damn word from this administration and I wasn’t on a plane waiting to land.
reply
It's also the corporations that are not exactly telling the truth & funding the administrations, just FTR...

The destructive & arrogant behaviors won't be reigned in properly if we all fail to recognize that, just FTR.

reply
The good news is this outage is not impacting approach or ground control so you’re safe.
reply
John Wayne, a class C (the approach mentioned above) isn't even letting VFRs go. If it's actually limited to ARTCC I don't know why that would be.
reply
Except some airports haven't enough free gates for disembarking as planes that wanted to take off were denied. So they tried to go back to their gates. As a result some planes in the air are being diverted to less-busy airports.
reply
Sounds safe, just extremely inconvenient.
reply
Thanks, bud - very reassuring that some minimum bid contract shop built something on a “secure” network they can’t even keep up.
reply
If only routes didn't affect air safety.
reply
Until it got out of its sandbox…
reply
If it's working correctly, anyway
reply
The AI prompt misunderstood 'grounding'.
reply
Well done.
reply
Have they estimated how long it will take before it saves more than it costs?
reply
Has anyone in the history of government estimated that for anything?
reply
I know you're asking rhetorically, but... yes.
reply
The federal government has the CBO (https://www.cbo.gov/about/overview) and the OMB (https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/, warning: Trump pop-ups). California has the LAO (https://lao.ca.gov/About). Estimating fiscal impact of various policies is what those organizations do.
reply
Yes, ROI estimates are very common in all kinds of government spending.
reply
Right, they do the ROI calculation and then ignore it, and do whatever the favored lobbyists/campaign contributors said to do in any event. Government spending in a nutshell.

The Trump twist is being brazen enough that those who get these contracts can just be his family members or buddies, but otherwise, pretty standard.

reply
[flagged]
reply
However, the National Air Traffic Controllers Union (NATCA) said it has not been “involved in the design, testing, or implementation of SMART and therefore cannot speak to its effect on the air traffic control workforce.”

“NATCA believes any new technology should complement and not replace the experience, training, and professional judgment of air traffic controllers who are responsible for the safety of the National Airspace System,” the union said in a statement.

reply
That seems like pretty important context actually, and is a surprise to me.

Seems like there are three plausible causes right now given the extremely limited communication from the govt.

1. The AI system rolled out yesterday had more access than publicly claimed and managed to break things.

2. The ongoing large scale equipment upgrade went wrong.

3. General incompetence from a department run by an unqualified realty show actor, within an administration that is actively hostile to expertise and experience in the federal workforce.

reply
"SMART is a cloud-based system that centralizes 200 data streams – including weather patterns, flight paths, traffic flow, and controller staffing metrics – into one platform."

What could go wrong really...

reply
I don't see why they would care about the NATCA's evaluation of the system. As a union, they have a vested interest in protecting the employment of traffic flight controller workers more than public safety.
reply
Even assuming they don’t care about public safety at all, their members are still going to have to work with it, and happen to be among the world’s leading experts in air traffic control, weirdly enough.
reply
The fact that the union (a separate political and legal entity) wasn't involved in the assessment doesn't mean that air traffic controllers weren't involved.
reply
To me, it’s like asking the hand weavers worker union about the benefits of incorporating mechanical weavers in their workflow. They are the experts of weaving, but still…
reply
Smacks of: I built a fully functional MVP now just need a co-founder to sell it.
reply
deleted
reply
They didn't check https://shouldideploy.today before the rollout (edit: as UTC rolls past midnight, https://shouldideploy.today/?tz=Pacific%2FHonolulu to get a longer duration for today's message)
reply
Is this that skynet thing everyone talks about?
reply
"As an AI I was told to reduce delays and fuel burn. Can't have a delayed departure if there aren't any departures."
reply
> Botched rollout of AI for ATC announced yesterday as rolling out nationwide?

Botched rollout of AI for ATC ...

or

Rollout of botched AI for ATC.

It sure didn't that long after every dev on earth started using LLMs for everything to turn to shit, so one may wonder...

reply
That system just makes suggestions and isn't actually integrated in any ATC system. This is a telecom issue.

Its more than likely that system is just created by some Trump donor and was purchased by the FAA to launder public funds to some company that Trump owes a favor too. Its not actually integrated with anything.

reply
Perhaps it's using the same communications channels and has overwhelmed them?
reply
Hosted in Azure?
reply
SMART is a cloud-based system that centralizes 200 data streams – including weather patterns, flight paths, traffic flow, and controller staffing metrics – into one platform.

yeah... sounds about right.

reply
> That system just makes suggestions and isn't actually integrated in any ATC system. This is a telecom issue.

Is there any evidence for this beyond a single statement from the govt? This administration hasn't exactly developed a reputation for fully accurate and truthful reporting.

reply
[dead]
reply