Not just overly detailed, it misses important hints that would help the reader and puts several things into one sentence in a way that the sentence is difficult to follow:

> For n-bit integer multiplication, multi-agent campaigns simplified the theoretical Turing-machine bound below n log n, while a separate effort gave a new O(n log n) algorithm on a single two-dimensional grid whose C implementation matches the GNU Multiple Precision Arithmetic Library (GMP) bit-for-bit up to a billion bits.

Is "simplify a bound" a normal wording? What does it mean to simplify a bound?

It is a shame that Gemini prose has become too detail dense in recent releases. Its prose was one of its distinct advantages over Claude with that annoying Claude speak...

It seems like they already announced /teamwork earlier [0], but now just announced that they got some scientific results out of it. They probably intentionally want to keep this low key, but in that case it's not clear why announce it at all.

[0]: https://antigravity.google/blog/teamwork-when-ai-becomes-a-r...

I'm pretty sure they didn't because of the following nonsensical sentence and how generally disorganized the post was:

"In under eight days, the engine gained roughly 2,600 Elo, reaching 1,885 Elo, placing it between KataGo at 16 and 32 visits per move."

It sounds like they're saying they now offer an option, "/teamwork", that will throw more computer at a problem by choosing a team and a workflow that you the user don't have to (or get to?) know about.

> I think the authors also used Antigravity to write this article, because it sucks at communicating whatever point it’s trying to make.

The pattern seems to be pervasive at Google. Too much Ai, not enough human, top-down orders