> Before I turned it on I asked my team if they had any objections.
replyDid you check with internal counsel?
> There has never been an illusion that anything said, written, or done at work is private from the company
The entire industry is one court case away from banning transcription. Not many companies want every word of every meeting legally discoverable - in the past, meetings were used to avoid having a written record. The implications of ubiquitous transcriptions haven't percolated yet, I give 1-3 years (or until the next major case)
This is all of course sanctioned by leadership and the teams who have standing (legal, IT, cybersecurity). Just because something is allowed doesn't mean I'll opt to do it. If I worked somewhere that hasn't been using corporate spyware on all employee laptops and face recognition around the building since long before auto transcription came in vogue I might feel differently about the decision to embrace the surveillance for productivity.
replyI don't have the authority to make the meaningful decisions, just to do my job efficiently.
I'm surprised lawyers aren't jumping all over this, not with you specifically, just generically everywhere.
replyCasual meetings can have misconstrued words.
What’s the legal theory here?
replySomeone sues, and stuff comes out in discovery.
reply