> If you start building Datacenters up in space, you need to send A LOT of Starships up there for MONTH to get ONE normal avg size GPU based DC in Space.

This isn't a massive problem for SpaceX as you want to believe it to be.

> This DC can then poisen our atmopshwere btw. and burns up limited resources on our own planet

So are you going to tell them to pause everything? (You won't) What solution do you have to them to solve this? (You don't have any solution.)

> They don't need the compute because their product Grok is not competitive.

That is false. Otherwise they would have given up on scaling Grok already.

> They don't use the compute to make Grok better because?!

So Cursor does not have any customers that use Grok on a regular basis beyond Twitter / X? Nor does Grok Bot need the compute either? (They most certainly do.)

Efficiency gains in their inference engines allow them to use less GPUs for themselves, and also sell that excess compute to others who are otherwise sold out. Both scenarios can be true and it doesn't mean they "don't need it" either.

> Amazon Leo will be though. Space-X has a first mover advantage

With what launch pad? SpaceX has plenty of their own and are building even more.

> What did Tesla do with it?

They built self-driving cars with "FSD" and autopilot with that advantage, and your point is?