I'm fascinated to know the kind of work that allows you to intelligently allocate so much resources. I use Claude extensively and feel that I great value out of it but I reach a limit in terms of what I can do that makes sense relatively quickly it seems.
replyYea basically we have an app that’s like Netflix but for dogs, so people can leave on dog oriented shows for their dogs when they get kombucha or coffee
replyOmg, I can't believe that's real
replyI wanted to believe that you're essentially trolling, but no - that service exist. And not an upstart, there is coverage going back several years.
Our societies are seriously fucked.
They are, but the dogs got it pretty good now. Good shows for good boys.
replyYou see, in any sane world the input box that can answer almost any question in the world should be more profitable than Netflix-for-dogs. But I bet it's not.
replyNever have I read something that screamed Bay Area more than this lmao.
replyThis product wouldnt be needed if they had a Juicero to dispense refreshing fresh squeezed juice anytime.
replydeleted
replySame for me, but I suppose it is letting agents more loose and less checking of the code and rather throw away lots of generated output.
replyGemini CLI shows how much was saved through caching each session, and it's usually somewhere around 90%
replyYou can use `npx ccusage` to check your local logs and see how much it would have cost through the API.
reply[flagged]
replyI'm surprised, isn't it forbidden to use the Max plan as part of a company? Just curious, as I thought it was forbidden by the ToS but I'm not sure if I have a good understanding of it
reply?
replyClaude Code has a Teams plan which includes Max tiers. Why would it be forbidden?
There is nothing in the TOS last time I checked forbidding it's use with Claude code. It's only forbidden to utilize it in the running of the business.
replySo getting Claude code subscriptions for developers should be permissable and not be against anything... However, if you created a rest endpoint to eg run a preconfigured prompt as part of your platform, that'd be against it
But I'm neither a lawyer nor work for anthropic
Ah, that makes sense. I hope they mean that then. We are just devs using it to write code; not selling it on.
replySurely that can't be true? The expectation would be that people pay $200 a month for building open source and personal hobby software with Claude?
replyYeah, that would end that really quickly. I use Pro for personal stuff. If $200 is not allowed for companies I don't think anyone would use it, at all.
replyMost companies forbid it though, since you're not covered by any legal protection - for example, Anthropic can use your data or code to train new models and more.
replyThis maybe was the case year+ ago but this is no longer the case, used to be most; now it is some/few
replyIf they believe a sufficient number is locked in then they may consider doing this later.
replyIf that were true, then everyone I know is violating that tos
reply> but not sure how to figure out what it would cost and I'm sure as hell not going to try.
replyAsk Opus to figure out how much it would cost. Lol.