upvote

points

by themafia23 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby Joel_Mckay17 hours ago|
[-]
US legal consensus has set the precedent that "AI" output can't be copyrighted. Thus, technically no one can really own or re-license prompt output.

Re-licensing public domain uncopyrightable work as GPL/LGPL is almost certainly a copyright violation, and no different than people violating GPL/LGPL in commercial works.

Linus is 100% wrong on this choice, and has introduced a serious liability into the foundation upstream code. =3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founder%27s_syndrome

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6WHBO_Qc-Q

reply
upvoteby noosphr16 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
>Re-licensing public domain work as GPL/LGPL is almost certainly a copyright violation

Remember kids never get your legal advice from hn comments.

reply
upvoteby Joel_Mckay16 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
I hire specialized IP lawyers to advise me how to mitigate risk: One can't assign licenses on something no one can legally claim right to. You should do the same unless you live in India or China.

Don't become the cautionary tale kid, as crawlers like sriplaw.com will be DMCA striking your public repos eventually. =3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkzy_420hts

reply
upvoteby kam17 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
> Being in the public domain is not a license; rather, it means the material is not copyrighted and no license is needed. Practically speaking, though, if a work is in the public domain, it might as well have an all-permissive non-copyleft free software license. Public domain material is compatible with the GNU GPL.

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#PublicDomain

reply
upvoteby Joel_Mckay16 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Yes, if it is clearly labeled as such, than GPL/LGPL licenced works may be included in such products. However, this relationship cannot make such works GPL without violating copyright, and doesn't magically become yours to re-license isomorphic plagiarized code from LLM.

For example, one may use NASA public domain photos as you wish, but cannot register copyright under another license you find convenient to sue people. Also, if that public domain photo includes the Nutella trademark, it doesn't protect you from getting sued for violating Ferrero trademarks/patents/copyrights in your own use-case.

Very different than slapping a new label on something you never owned. =3

reply
upvoteby 10 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
deleted
reply