upvote
Looks like we're gonna have to go full CIA mode and shift into maximum OPSEC if we want any semblance of privacy. Gotta compartmentalize everything...
reply
Good luck with that. Companies simply don't want to invest in security. It's simply cheaper to write a post-mortem and apology blog post after the fact.

The sad thing is that people are used by now that anything they enter on a website is sooner or later going to be leaked, if not sold as if often happens with email addresses.

reply
Sue them out of existence then.
reply
How many lawsuits against large companies can one person afford?
reply
This has been an ineffective plan for guaranteeing the rights of the citizen in this country.

A new default is needed.

reply
Interesting that people immediately think of workarounds instead of rejecting the governments and corporations behind the thing. Year by year Overton Window moves, workarounds become more and more involved and eventually people will give up and become just living datapoints on corporate/government dashboard.
reply
Rejecting the government is insurrection, it's the same as becoming a terrorist.
reply
You are called terrorist only until you win then you are a freedom fighter.

You even may be called freedom fighter from the start if you are trying to displace government in the right country. There are plenty of examples.

reply
I realize that. I'm just saying that "reject the government" is a radical choice. It's not something the average first world citizen is going to think about. US government has been eroding the freedom of americans for nearly a century now. American citizens have a bigger arsenal than many actual countries out there. And what do they do with all of those weapons? Literally nothing.

Only those who are willing to die have the power to truly change the world. Those who don't want to die are dominated by those who do. The average citizen of a civilized society has a lot to lose. They don't want to die over nothing. They want to get even richer and enjoy an even better life. It's the people who have nothing to lose and everything to gain who are radicalized.

reply
A terrorist works with terror (fear).

Also at least in democracies you can reject the government without physical violence.

reply
> A terrorist works with terror (fear).

Extreme, yet I can't deny its effectiveness. How do you radicalize a decadent, apathetic population? People who literally do not give a shit about important issues because they have too much to lose, because they'd have to give up their comfortable lifestyles? Terrorists attack them directly, breaking the illusion that their almighty governments can protect them. They gave up all those freedoms, paid all those taxes, sacrificed their principles, all in the name of security... Only to discover they aren't safe at all. Quite ironic, really. No wonder governments worldwide are willing to pull out all the stops against terrorists.

> Also at least in democracies you can reject the government without physical violence.

Doubt. To me it seems democracies exist just to give people the illusion of choice, not to give them any real power. The reality is people are manipulated by the mass media, their very wants and desires are shaped by it. Censorship is growing world wide, even in "democratic" governments, because they want to reserve the right to shape the population's collective mind. And when even that fails, it turns out every politician answers to the corporations anyway. They literally buy laws via lobbyists. If by some miracle some law gets passed to benefit people at the expense of corporations, the lobbyists swoop in and neuter it with hidden loopholes and fine print.

reply
> in democracies you can reject the government

No, you cannot. You can reject the current party, but the government is much more than that. In the US, for example, the government is a set of institutions that were put in power in the American revolution. If you try to reject this your own life is at risk.

reply
I would argue that many people do “reject” the government, but they do so by abstaining from the political process. This is why participation is low. It’s not a direct threat to the government so the government doesn’t do anything.

The U.S. government is confident enough in their appearance of legitimacy that they allow pretty broad liberty to criticize it. This is in contrast to other governments like China or Russia or even Singapore which are much less secure about their legitimacy.

reply
Learn about the origin of word terrorism (hint: it was term for rogue government acting against its peoples)
reply