Also, he owned the Miss Universe org (including Miss USA and Miss Teen USA) for decades, and he was known to walk into the dressing rooms of teen contestants as young as 15 while they were undressed. [0]
Also, he bragged about molesting women, and a court of law found that he sexually assaulted E Jean Carroll.
I haven't proven the case that Trump had sex with a minor, but there's way more than enough probable cause to believe it's more likely than not.
[0] https://web.archive.org/web/20200111171647/https://www.rolli...
And incidentally you can be convicted in a court of law purely on circumstantial evidence, and that's the place in society where we have the highest standard of proof. The evidence all being circumstantial is not a gotcha.
Not really relevant to the thread, but there are simple answers to the "eViDeNcE??" question. You may have already known this.
yes
> When deepfake generators are capable of creating convincing imagery of flawless ideal fake humans, why do you suppose there’s so many real humans who report being non-consensual subjects of deepfake porn?
?
You say this so casually, as though it were a normal thing to know, or as if a normal person would know it. Does that actually seem true where you live right now?
And how do you know that, anyway, Harsh? I mean, all those "unblocked" games you stole to give away and that you also put on Github, that's one thing. But this...
Maybe you can explain why it is that, whenever lately I'm less than perfectly accurate on the specific granular technical requirements and details of using AI to generate kiddie porn, an entire legion of creepy anons comes pouring out of the woodwork to well-actually and bikeshed and bullshit about it.
Since you are the one of them now here, answer me this: why is that? Are you really so anxious to prove your empiricism superior that you presumptively confess a major felony, just for the want of a stranger's well, you're right? Is there really so little in your life that this can mean so much?