upvote
Almost literally every single social media site in the past ~15+ years has had those exact terms in it.

Everything you upload, almost everywhere, can be used by the site owners to do whatever they like for their own purposes (reselling is somewhat often excluded / non-transferrable). There are a handful of exceptions, but they're very much exceptions, not the normal rule.

reply
HN maybe?
reply
I cancelled my Instagram account when they added those terms in the early 2010s. At the time it was mostly photographers reading them and closing accounts but it wasn’t exactly a secret.
reply
Speak for yourself.

“Few”, maybe.

reply
"No one" does not literally mean "not a single individual" in common English parlance, something that everyone (see what I did there?) here understands.
reply
Yes it does. If I'm asked how many people are in the pool and I respond "no one", that means not a single individual.
reply
It literally does mean that.

It figuratively does not.

You’re not going to change the meaning of two words, here…

reply
I mean, I read them, but just goes to show the majority of people skipped this important reading.

If anyone actually read them it's typically a unlimited unrestricted pipe of data they can use for anything.

reply
No one reads the terms and conditions. I went to a resort and read the T&C they made you sign to sign in and was told I was the only person in months who had actually done so.

And even I have mostly given up on the website T&C because most of them are so lengthy, a lot like I've given up on disabling javascript since the modern web frequently won't even render anything if you disable it.

reply
NoScript allows most of the modern web to work with selective whitelisting.
reply
99% of people don't read terms and condition.
reply
We’re saying the same thing.
reply