upvote
I think this needs to be addressed with a crowd-funded projectile. This sort of stuff must be done on a planetary-scale consensus basis only.
reply
What a terrible tyranny of the majority problem that would be. I reject this idea completely
reply
[flagged]
reply
[flagged]
reply
> You'll be sad to know there's another mf trying to put a mirror to reflect sunlight near twilight

This has been approved:

* https://ca.pcmag.com/networking/16760/fcc-approves-reflect-o...

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866452

reply
To anyone thinking that 18m² isn't that big for how large the space is, please recall how bright reflective things shine during the day when you hit the right angle.
reply
18x18 is 324m^2
reply
Whoops, I overcooked my last minute edits while almost asleep. Yeah, I'm was off by 18x there.
reply
To give an easy visualization for most people (average Americans, really, because most other people in the world already know what a meter looks like), imagine that the average doorknob is about 1m above the floor, so imagine basically the bottom part of a typical interior door is about 1m sq. Now, make a square out of 18 of those pieces wide by 18 pieces high.
reply
I feel "about a 8 floor building" would be a good ROM :)
reply
Americans will measure with anything but the metric system.
reply
And if they do, they will call it things like "square doorknob".
reply
Except for those few of us who grew up interested in science, because science pretty much world-wide (even in the USA) uses metric for pretty near everything. I've used metric for my entire life, and been ridiculed for it that entire time by all the same morons that think any interest in science makes you a "nerd" even if you also happen to play and enjoy sports (despite almost the entire rest of the world standardizing on metric long ago), and despite the fact that most folks in the USA are already using metric themselves every single day. Yet somehow metric is "too hard to learn, waaah!" (It's based on tens, just like our money. Too complicated? Gimme a break!) Hell, our sugary fizzy drinks even all come in 1 and 2 liter bottles, FFS!
reply
For Americans: this is roughly 3500 sqft.
reply
So very roughly a 300kW spotlight pointed at a relatively small area (wild guess at around 1km^2, anyone done the maths?)

Edit: A 5km diameter spot illuminated from 600km altitude.

reply
Every colleagues watch face.
reply
A gigantic source of light in the sky that lights up a part of the Earth and is too bright to look at is... the sun. I think we're all used to the sun.
reply
I personally am _not_ used to seeing the sun after sunset and before sunrise.
reply
Neither is nature, this sounds like an environmental disaster waiting to happen
reply
considering plants grow just fine with grow lights, they don't really care. same with co2, they LOVE CO2
reply
Nature is more than just plants.
reply
> they LOVE CO2

Plants can absorb some more CO2 and it improves their growth slightly but saying they LOVE CO2 is an exaggeration.

reply
They turn it into sugar, what's not to love?
reply
Solar panels aren't nature. Shining lights on solar panels is not going to be an environmental disaster.
reply
everyone’s seen ads before, mind if I put a giant ad in the sky for everyone to look at?
reply
Don't give these ghouls ideas.
reply
The idea of putting a PepsiCo or Coca-Cola ad on the moon dates backs to the 60's, when we first went there.
reply
Wut? This has to be some sort of a scam. There's no way you're going to be reflecting enough light from hundreds of kilometers away.
reply
It works fantastically well for construction and military applications.
reply
Based on what? You get the light of the moon for about 5 minutes.
reply
I’m pretty sure the plan is to have tens of thousands of them so that they can hand off from one satellite to the next. I know this tech would have been fantastic when I used to work on oil rigs in super remote locations.
reply
It's not. USSR and Russia experimented with space mirrors and was able to light significant territory. It was a successful program, but in 1993 Russia had no money to continue the project, so it was wrapped up.
reply
[dead]
reply
I really hope it's a scam, because if not, and this is allowed to exist, we're fucked.
reply
oh dear, the stakes are so high
reply