upvote
That seems unlikely. Just imagine humanity 100, 1000, and 1,000,000 years from now. Humans will have solved every physical problem that is solvable.

Humans will have also evolved into new kinds of immortal/superintelligent beings that would be totally unrecognizable to us.

It may be the case once a civilization reaches "max level" they universally decide to "reset the game" because there's nothing left to do. Maybe self-destruction or maybe they "spawn" a new universe. The possibilities are wild.

reply
Why do you think that? Life on Earth has been around for billions of years and and yet we have no immortal beings nor all problems in physics solved.

There’s no reason beyond wishful thinking to believe any of that is true.

reply
Everything we know and see has proven that progress is exponential.

Your statement that progress or intelligence is binary has no basis outside of intentional and ignorant pessimism.

reply
And if you extrapolate the growth of infants they should weigh billions of pounds by the time they’re in grade school, and yet they don’t.

In what basis do you presume our progress will continue exponentially?

I’ll take pessimism over wishful thinking.

reply
Tell that to the Romans or the Chinese or the Ottomans or the Egyptians or the Greeks or the...
reply
The Earth only developed intelligent life a few million years ago, us (homo sapiens) a few hundred thousand years ago.

We've only been in "technological takeoff" for ~250 years and are already using spaceships and computers to deliver and operate drones on Mars.

Now imagine 250 years + 1,000,000 years.

reply
Civilizations collapse, do you think we're immune to that now because technology is at some level?
reply
Of course humanity is not immune, but it is resilient.

Even if 99.99% of people died from an asteroid, it might only take a few hundred (or thousand) years to rebuild the population and the world.

And once humans live on multiple planets, which is likely within 100 years, the odds of permanent extinction become remote.

reply
Brother, it takes several hundred years to recover from a political collapse of a civilization. A few thousand is in the ballpark for a 90% reduction in population coincident with a similar loss in knowledge. A 99.99% reduction would be more like tens of thousands of years.

It's not just that we need to have people living on another planet, we need a fully self-sufficient civilization on another planet which is at least 200+ years of sustained effort probably more because it took that long under the relatively ideal and easy conditions of simply settling another continent. Then factor in that their civilization would be even more precarious than ours and face many more dangers.

reply
You can make up your own numbers for the timeline.

Life is still likely (not guaranteed) to escape Earth one way or another, however long it takes and however many attempts it takes.

reply
It is impressive, but there’s no reason to think it will continue on the same trajectory.
reply
No cohesive civilization on earth has been able to continue uninterrupted for 1000 years, our chances aren't as good as you think they are especially since our current civilization is showing all of the signs of being over the hill and accelerating in its decline. Technological advances can be lost and the capacity of a civilization to accomplish far reaching goals can stall and degrade and eventually cease all together. Anyone who doesn't think we're on a ticking clock is either hopelessly optimistic or ignorant of history, probably both.
reply
> No cohesive civilization on earth has been able to continue uninterrupted for 1000 years...

Not sure what your definition of "cohesive" is but we've had our civilization going for ~5000 years with only regional setbacks.

reply
I imagine that 100 years from now(or significantly less than that) the ocean water level will be several meters higher, large parts of the world will be unliveable due to heat waves and wars will be fought over food and water. I doubt our species will last another 1000.
reply
I'm very confident our species will last longer than the next 1000 years. Our current civilisation, though, now that's a completely different story.
reply
Yeah if we're back to sticks and stones we might as well be extinct as far as I'm concerned.
reply
You might try spending some time reading predictions of doom and gloom from the past. It should be very reassuring.
reply
In not talking about baseless predictions. I'm talking about science. This is not speculation, it's not a possible future scenario, this is the world we currently live in and the trajectory we know for a fact that it is taking. We're setting heat records literally every year. All over the world. The polar ice caps, Greenland etc are melting rapidly, this is not speculation these are facts, these are things currently happening.

We know how much ice is on land, people have spent decades drilling the ice and calculating it's volume etc, we know it's melting because there's way less of it now than there was just decades ago and we know how much that melted ice will influence water levels.

We know the effect greenhouse gases have on the atmosphere and global temperatures, people have made scientifically informed charts predicting how the temperature will rise decades ago and we are right on track.

The prediction happened when I was a child, and all my life I've watched the prediction come true. The fact that there's still millions if not billions of people out there who are living through the same situation and still think climate change is a hoax is absolutely baffling to me. Just look at a fucking global average temperature chart for the past few decades holy shit man it's not a secret the planet is cooking. It's not maybe going to cook 500 years from now it's cooking right now and it's getting worse every year how can you possibly look at these simple clear facts and not understand that it's going to continue?

You guys annoy me so much holy shit open your eyes and just look at the world we live in

reply
Greenhouse gas emissions are a huge problem, but there's no reason to believe we can't solve or mitigate the effects one way or another. It may come at a terrible cost, or it may turn out to be easier than you'd expect.

You're not using "science" to predict the future. You're just expressing a pessimistic belief that we're doomed for some specific reason.

To me, optimism seems far more justified based on our track record, we've more-or-less solved some big problems:

- "Population growth is going to cause worldwide famine"

- "We are going to run out of oil and civilization will collapse"

- "The ozone hole is going to expose everyone to dangerous radiation"

- "Acid rain is going to destroy forests and kill lakes"

- "City air pollution is going to make major cities unlivable"

- and smallpox/polio/HIV/leaded gasoline/etc

reply
I feel like we’re surrounded by the reality of the Great Filter and yet people still cling to the science fiction fantasy of their youth.
reply