People will use it if it really delivers gain and can solve problems PG can't.

People are very willing to use new things when something they are using can't do what they want to do.

Dogma is more effective than reliability concerns in my experience. It just happens that the dogma prefers Postgres in this case.

It is just difficult to make these decisions in a more informed way because it requires actual manual testing with the concrete use case and also a decent understanding of databases in question. Chances are you won't have people that understand these things or those people won't have much of a say in decisions.

There's also the fact that it's basically vibecoded.

We still have companies that use COBOL and mainframes due to their longevity and continuity. There is no reason Postgres and pgrust cannot both flourish. I can pick and choose which one to use according to its use case.

Their ai agents will if we keep writing about it

Project managers and Human Resources rolling out overengineered projects will outnumber current software engineers 10 to 1