This sounds possible but how can we know? It could just as well correlate. Effort of all kinds correlates with success even when it's not obvious or not... linear.
>This sounds possible but how can we know?
If usage correlated with ROI, we would never stop hearing about it from the big AI firms.
The fact is that a bunch of marks and rubes got suckered into buying snake oil.
Sure, you could say all digital transformations are nebulous snake oil and don't deliver but I just don't think this is the case.
That's a pretty low bar if you ask me.
AI has created a generation of 0.125x engineers.
If you make an effort to use the new tools effectively, the gains are wild. Don't fall into a grumpy luddite trap, the train is leaving the station and you'll struggle to catch up if you don't learn and grow.
Not using AI for software development in 2027 will be like only knowing how to program via punchcard in 2010.
It's new. It's different. It's hard. It's your job. Learn how to use it effectively, embrace the new abundance mindset.
He doesn't deserve his job; He is not qualified for technical leadership.
This. Except it’s not that hard to get proficient. Either learn it or get left behind same as it ever was in software tech.
The key question is how much value has been delivered on the other end for a given cost. Well used, tokens would be cheap at 10x the price right now.
If that's true things are truly hopeless for pre-school/school children who are not in position to jump on the train just yet.