upvote
Subscribers already get random rolling resets.
reply
Which is not that great for people using less than 50% every week, because the next reset date moves forward too. In essence, it is redistributing compute from people who haven't used their quota much to those who have.

Though I think they gave a banked reset this time.

reply
Pretty much. I had 24 hours left with 80% remaining credit (planned big session tomorrow). There was reset one hour ago, that effectively halved my tokens for next 8 days!
reply
Do they take them back? Codex a few weeks ago said I had 2 resets. I didn't use any, and now it doesn't say that.
reply
They do in fact expire.
reply
Subscribers were already getting subsidised compute and value compared to the 20-200$ fee, peak cakeism to want more considering the alternative would likely be consumption based pricing for individuals so you "benefit" from OpenAI giving up some of their markup (and heavy users end up SOL).
reply
Looks like you’ve confused clarification for begging
reply
There was context for neither in your original post and I personally saw a lot of similar takes like the above online - apologies for the misunderstanding. I personally thought it was pretty clear considering the parent link is a link to the API pricing and their public communication on their twitter/blogs were "Subscription usage remains unchanged".
reply
Typically subscription usage follows API pricing, but that disclaimer was absent from this HN link. It's only clear if you've seen those other communications
reply
How do you know? I see a “weekly usage limit” bar in my ChatGPT settings, but I’m pretty fuzzy about what makes it go down.

If I stick with Luna, I can make it through the week.

reply
ChatGPT Work and Codex use that. Normal chat has a different, unspecified limit.
reply
Yep. I'm actually using ChatGPT integration via exe.dev to write code. It uses my subscription through an API and runs down the usage limit in a similar way.

The part I don't understand is how usage is "charged" against this limit.

reply