Reminds me of the FTL neutrinos too, where the scientist where pretty much "hey, something is wrong, can you help us figure it out?" and the general public were the ones screaming "OMG! Physics is dead!"
replyThen when it comes out as measurement error, the public is all "Damn these scientists are all hype machine clowns..."
That was a fiendish thing to debug; if I recall correctly it was a slightly and intermittently defective connector.
replyI’m fine with that. Put it at the feet of pop science blogging.
replyI’m less fine with the time and resources spent on mouse models. They already know you’d get the same utility from a magic 8 ball, but they do it anyway.
Mouse models are useful to discard very bad ideas. There was a recent experiment to use bacteria to kill cancer https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46306894 They tried like 40 bacterias in vitro, then like 9 in mice, and only 1 was useful in mice and they will continue only with that, perhaps in humans. Anyway, as you suggest, there is a high chance it will fail.
replyAlso, you can do nasty stuff to mice that would never be allowed with humans. In that experiment they injected cancer cells in mice with a bad inmune system, so they could get like 90 mice with cancer and run the experiment in a short time. No ethical committee would approve that in humans.
Wow haha, that is a lot of authors! Never seen this before!
replyMost horrifying is a 2014 Science paper on Ebola with 58 authors, 5 of whom died of Ebola before publication.
https://www.science.org/content/article/ebolas-heavy-toll-st...
replyThe ATLAS-CMS joint Higgs boson mass measurement paper has close to 6000 authors: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.191803
replyI think the final COVID consortium report has something like 30k authors.
> we had to retract because significance started dropping almost the day the paper was approved.
replyIt's stories like this that raise my p(we are in a simulation).