upvote
> I'm trying to answer why I don't see this happen, because I worked in this industry for more than 20 years.

And despite that experience, you do not see the universal value in reliable, verifiable image attestation for any user? You cannot imagine why that may not just be very useful, but quickly become required, what the "end-user demand", "business-value" or "industry-requirements" could be?

reply
This is not what I wrote and a very bad-faith statement of yours.

There is universal value in many features, yet they didn't become a commodity in all smartphone-tiers.

I don't see how and why this feature should become a default in all smartphones, which you keep insisting on without apparently comprehending the industry and market aspects I am trying to explain.

Peace.

reply
What? Those three sentences are not really compatible with each other?! How is it bad-faith (honestly trying to understand what you mean) if you then add:

> I don't see how and why this feature should become a default in all smartphones [...]

So, do you see universal value or not? Cause that was what I wrote, that you do not seem to despite it being obvious to anyone who thinks about why phones of any price have cameras.

reply
deleted
reply