upvote

points

by xbmcuser9 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby josephg7 hours ago|
next
[-]
It doesn't read as emphasis to me. It reads like the person is trying hard not to curse, and they think "crap" is a curse word. It's a little bit adorable, like I'm reading a comment from an obedient child.
reply
upvoteby xbmcuser5 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
I guess you are not from the generation of texters. This how languages work we used to use * as a way to avoid getting censored it over time became a way to curse or give emphasis.
reply
upvoteby Sharlin1 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
I'm definitely from the generation of texters and there was never any censorship going on with SMSs... yours must be a cultural or regional thing.
reply
upvoteby collabs1 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Maybe you didn't have T9 enabled but I consider it censorship when I type bitch and it gives me chubi.

Even now I wonder if I am allowed to type bitch here...

I guess we will find out.

reply
upvoteby Sharlin1 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
But typing "b*tch" with T9 is just as difficult (if not more) as typing "bitch". Anyway, I guess I never had a need to swear much over SMS. On IRC, on the other hand...
reply
upvoteby mixermachine48 minutes ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
Am I, with around 30, in this generation? Putting * in words seems like self censorship to me. Still, might have a cultural component. German here.
reply
upvoteby nairboon1 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
Is that a cultural/national thing instead of an age thing?

I've never had texts censored by texting providers, they're not supposed to read texts in the first place (at least around here).

reply
upvoteby josephg5 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
Sounds like a generational thing.

I grew up texting. But in the 90s any profanity filters could just be turned off in settings.

reply
upvoteby 107292874 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
People are getting used to censor themselves in order not to be reported, banned, or «hurt » other sensibilities. The words « rape » couldn’t be written in instagram for example, what a great way to deal with such a serious issue. Mainly an American thing spreading away from young people if you ask me. Sorry America, just being honest here.
reply
upvoteby sampullman3 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
America is partly guilty, but TikTok censorship is a big part of the younger generation's tendency toward self censorship.
reply
upvoteby bragh2 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
As much as I personally dislike TikTok, I don't think it is fair to it: cultural willingness for more sensor sheep on Internet started years before TikTok's popularity in the west.
reply
upvoteby sampullman1 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
It's not the sole cause, but I believe it's the main driver behind a bunch of specific substitutions that are mainstream now or nearly so. For example, dih, ahh, and unalive. They may not have been invented on tiktok, but that's where they incubated.
reply
upvoteby well_ackshually1 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
There's no such censorship on TikTok, it's entirely groupthink based on people saying "when I use that word my video is seen less so therefore it's being censored".

Youtube is a lot more guilty of it though, as well as demonetizing.

reply
upvoteby sampullman10 minutes ago|
parent|
next
[-]
How is that not a form of censorship? It is direct suppression of certain forms of speech.

YouTube has its problems but I don't think it's had quite as strong of an effect on language.

reply
upvoteby collabs1 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
well_ackshually, tik tok has a well known, long, and rich history of suppressing certain search keywords.
reply
upvoteby mixermachine43 minutes ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
After reading through the threat here it seems more like a cultural thing. The US has quite a lot of filters for profanity. I remember from my youth that in 2009 Eminem was a guest in a Germany TV show and very happy to swear as much as possible without being censored. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/2OC-yKZ5Yag
reply
upvoteby nairboon1 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
You had profanity filters for SMS?
reply
upvoteby saberience2 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
I’ve been texting since it was first a thing (sms on Nokia phones) and no one I knows does this. We just say shit, fuck, and crap.
reply
upvoteby lofaszvanitt1 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
stop feeding nonsense to the masses
reply
upvoteby Tade01 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
I think a string of non-alphanumeric characters would work much better here, like "Once you have allowed that proprietary @#$&% into your C++ codebase”

Leaves more to the imagination.

reply
upvoteby westonmyers4 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
In any context I've seen, asterisks are for wrapping formatting and said formatting it to add emphasis. So being in the habit of typing `emphasised phrase`, for italics - regardless of whether the platform parses markdown/similar formatting, e.g. SMS.

To have an unclosed asterisk replacing characters in a word? I've only ever seen that as a way to bypass censorship. This spans communications from people currently in their 40s down to 20.

reply
upvoteby vladde3 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
i do this to put emphasis, i always type "h*ck".

(although it is a half-joke since it's definitely not a curse word imo)

reply
upvoteby lsofzz6 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
like for example, c*nt?
reply
upvoteby kbenson5 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Maybe more like p**p, as in "that cunt p**ped in my yard"?

I'll admit, it never once occurred to me that people might be using censored characters to provide more emphasis that a word is a swear, but I guess it does indeed do that, at least to the writer. Whether that comes across to the reader, and whether the writer cares that their intention was understood... I'm not so sure.

reply
upvoteby fc417fc8023 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
What about ^#%& as was traditional in newspaper comics strips?
reply
upvoteby ElFitz3 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
How about "Pockmark!... Freshwater swabs!... Bully!.." or "Amoeba! Bashi-bazouks! Chowderheads! Certified Diplodocuses! Nyctalop! Ectoplasm!"?
reply
upvoteby RugnirViking1 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
I was so disappointed when I tried reading tintin in other languages and found the dear captain was straight up using slurs in those. I wonder whether the english language ones have been edited over the years to remove that sort of thing
reply
upvoteby yehoshuapw2 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
"Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!"
reply
upvoteby latexr1 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Known as grawlix or obscenicon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grawlix

reply
upvoteby lsofzz4 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Hah. Yeah, I agree. It's one of those things I admit is `lost in translation` for sure.
reply