upvote
The whole idea of Greater Israel would make anyone in the region queasy. The logic is pretty hard to dispute when Israelis claim the lang is God given. The "God given" land actually extends much farther beyond Israel's boundaries so I'd say people of those countries are rightful feel as they do.

Like immagine if the rhetoric of Turkey was constantly talking about expanding to Greece and how the land of Greece is historically the Turks. Obviously that would make any Greek uneasy.

reply
Seeing how things have played out this year, maybe this will end up being their undoing. Israel has made it clear that the next domino to fall after Iran is Turkey. I don't even know how that would work. Isn't Turkey a NATO ally? At some point, this has got to stop. After everything that's come out this year, I wonder if an alternative world where a lot of these Middle Eastern countries developing into stable democracies could have occurred had Israel been contained or never been created.
reply
The Turks would never dream of irridentism, expansion, a Blue Homeland, the destruction of neighbouring peoples or neo-Ottomanism. Absolutely never.

And the Greeks are historically famous for being quite laissez-faire when it comes to their eastern borders.

source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsbm-YGRmCs

reply
Few countries have given back so much land for peace. Consider of the percentage of land returned for peace with Egypt.
reply
The idea of “greater Israel” is a bogeyman that lives in the heads of people that hates Israel in several factors of greater numbers than there are people in Israel who believe that.

You can literally count with both hands the amount of people in Israel that advocate for “greater Israel”

reply
Well, Syria and Lebanon both hold some pretty serious resentment over the recent landgrabs. With the whole "acquiring buffer zone for the buffer zone" business in former and the population expulsions in the latter.
reply
But they hated Israel before the recent land grab, right? And they seem less bothered by the much bigger Turkish land grab.
reply
I answered your question, no need to move the goalposts. Countries usually don't like having their land occupied. As far as I know the Turkish occupation zone in Syria has been dissolved.
reply
[flagged]
reply
Not OC, but don’t be daft.

How modern Israel came to be upon “God promised land”?

That’s the main reason and I do not believe in any possibility of any peace in the region, whatever bullshit politicians would say.

Tell me why anyone in the region shouldn’t be pissed of at Israel (and to their piggy banks in the West)?

reply
The original formation was a land grab. Jews owned 6% of the land in Mandatory Palestine in 1947. The other 94% was ethnic cleansing.
reply
> The other 94% was ethnic cleansing.

That's not really an accurate characterization of the situation as much of the land was uninhabited/unregistered and/or state owned. The Negev desert for example is a large percentage of the total land area and was effectively uninhabited and not privately owned. Land ownership records at the time were also not particularly clear and often there were disputed claims. Also Israel has about 20% Arab/Palestinian citizens so it's not like they ethnically cleansed everyone like Egypt/Jordan did with the Jews in Gaza and the West Bank when Israel gained independence.

reply
But if that were the cause why do countries like Malaysia and Pakistan have diplomatic relations with let's say a country like Australia?
reply
I dont understand the analogy but none of those countries are committing ongoing massive human rights violations or apartheid conditions?
reply
Indiscriminate bombing of innocent people, maybe?

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwylx1vq18zo

reply
The Shia from South Lebanon still remember the seven Shia villages in Palestine that were ethnically cleansed by Zionist forces in 1948. [1]

It's still a major propaganda point for Hezbollah.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shia_villages_in_Palestine

reply
> Palestinians aside,

That easy huh

reply
> My friend recommended a documentary to me recently about Hitler. It was about Hitler's atrocities. But my friend, god love her, she couldn't think of the word atrocities. She tried to cover for a second; she went "ahhh—" while she searched for a synonym, but it didn't come out right.

She said, "Gary, I saw this very interesting documentary about Hitler's shenanigans." [audience laughter] Shenanigans! [he chuckles] Not even close!

And, as a Jew, I'm obviously not oversensitive, but when people trivialize Hitler's monkey-business... [audience laughter] When the Nazis' hijinks, tomfoolery, and ballyhoo is understated, I feel it does a disservice to the millions who were, ahhh, inconvenienced by Hitler's mischief! [audience laughter]

Tomato, tomahto. Shenanigans, genocide.

(Gary Gulman bit)

https://youtube.com/watch?v=d4pOPNUcHNc

reply
[flagged]
reply
Two things can be true at the same time. There’s no denying that there’s an extreme amount of antisemitism in eg Pakistan that would still be there if Israel would behave properly.
reply
deleted
reply
Your comment makes no sense whatsoever. Moreover your account was created minutes ago. What time does your shift end?
reply
deleted
reply
Because Israel invaded a land that had been settled by Arab Muslims for centuries, claimed a portion for itself exclusively, proceeded to ethnically cleanse an even bigger portion, all with the support of their extremely powerful western backers. Asking "why did the others hate them" is like asking "why would Europeans hate the Chinese if they had invaded, settled and ethnically cleansed half of France (with the promise of taking even more later)"?
reply
Israel refuses to even define its borders. And current behaviour demonstrates why.
reply
> Israel refuses to even define its borders. And current behaviour demonstrates why.

States like Israel formally define their borders via mechanisms like peace deals that include bilateral recognition of agreed upon borders, like Israel has with Egypt and Jordan.

You can't realistically define borders properly otherwise, trying to define borders via unilateral declaration doesn't really work when there are 2 states next to each other, the borders ultimately need to be negotiated bilaterally between those states with both sides recognizing the same borders.

reply
Ethnically cleansing Palestine is reason enough to hate Israel. As an American I’ll add that I hate their influence on my country via bribes and blackmail, and how they strip my rights (anti-BDS laws…) and steal my tax dollars. Spying on everyone via things like the OP don’t help either.
reply
hah, I've got something for your anti bds law if you're put in front of court:

funding Israel violates the separation of church and state.

reply
You don't even need to go that far. These anti-BDS laws are clearly against the constitution and get struck down without issue. The real problem is that it's much easier to create these BS laws and put them on the books than it is to repeal them, because repealing them requires court challenges, lawsuits, and then these supporters go and make alterations to the law to meet the criteria of the challenges and ram them through again. Then we go through this whole cycle all over again. To solve this problem, you really need to go after the public officials that are being pushed to pass this garbage by consistently holding their feet to the fire and not tolerating this with punishments of losing their elections. The country is shifting towards that, but there's so much BS going on elsewhere that this takes a back burner in people's minds.
reply
[flagged]
reply
[flagged]
reply
This doesn't work anymore give it up man
reply
What doesn't work? Comparing people's rhetoric?
reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

  "Whataboutism" or "whataboutery" (as in, "but what about X?") refers to the propaganda strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of offering an explanation or defense against the original accusation. It is an informal fallacy that the accused party uses to avoid accountability [...]
reply
I do think your goal is to smear me since everything I said is true and you didn’t address any of my points. You can start with the anti-BDS laws.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-BDS_laws

reply
I don't want to smear you... proceeds to try to smear you
reply