upvote
Is he on bluesky or another platform? There is a ton of folks, including myself, who won't use "X" at all, some political, some due to other reasons. For me? All of the above and plus they demand that I install an app on my phone, something I am not willing to do, especially since most of the folks I've followed went to Bluesky, AND I've found way more awesome folks there than I ever did on X. I'm not shilling Bluesky, it is just the biggest/most widely accepted platform in this social area if you exclude meta/facebook.
reply
However, Bsky people really hate AI last I checked.
reply
eh, there are plenty of AI researchers on there. Also a handy "AI haters" labeler you can subscribe to to filter out people who just want to yell.

The labeler thing is cool; I really like ATproto because you can do interesting things with it. If I'm honest, though, I mainly like Bluesky because I don't get called slurs on there.

reply
> with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different.

Are those the agentic tools the LLM developed for you? How can you be sure they can be trusted and that you even understand them correctly and are not biased towards making you feel like they are trustworthy? This is exactly the AI2027 scenario where researchers are fooled by their own super AI telling them what they want to hear ("our model solved alignment!") while successfully hiding its true intention.

Also Yudkowsky's Cat-Belling would like a serious word with Nick. (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/SwYBLQvo8MddDcCwz/cat-bellin...)

reply
The specific method outlined here seems pretty doable by today's models, which don't seem smart enough to have some kind of 4d chess hidden alignment.

You just have to go through a ton of all of a model's neurons and identify the associated motif, then use that model as a research model to figure out how to tune out bad behavior.

It's pretty hard to imagine today's models subtly recognizing a motif for bad behavior in the research model and then lying about it. Or lying about the results of an alignment training run. It's possible, I guess, but it seems unlikely, and I don't really think there's any evidence of current models having that variety of misalignment.

reply
deleted
reply
Important context is getting flagged out of the replies to this comment. An unfortunate state of affairs.
reply
What did it say? One comment is totally flagged away now
reply
I’m not flagging anything!
reply
> The vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible, and their circuits beautiful.

That's very encouraging. For quite a while, neural nets were considered an incomprehensible black box. That paper shows they're not. Real progress.

reply
Not sure if there is formal arXiv paper to be released other than this long form Goodfire AI blog post (love the animations!), but if what Nick demonstrated/observed were indeed true, this will resolve the Super intelligence alignment issues that p(doom)-ers have been crying aloud in the past few years.

The most iconic line was the last sentence:

   a bitter lesson for interpretability: the simple thing, at absurd scale, works
This feels like the watershed moment, again if Nick is proven right, as massive as the AlexNet victory in the 2012 ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge, exactly as Nick pointed out.

Also, I suspect what Nick hinted at, might be the discovery of earliest RSI work.

   with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different.
reply
deleted
reply
[flagged]
reply
Newton lost a huge amount of money in the South Seas bubble
reply
Tide goes in, tide goes out. Im low key of the opinion that these tools enhance existing attributes while displacing the advantages of unearned social or financial power.

So in the short term the tide might go out but then it might tsunami back.

Same goes for this terrifying political feeling around the world. Might simply be a boomer swansong and the reaction might snap back.

reply
> displacing the advantages of unearned social or financial power

A technology that lets you directly buy intelligence with money will displace financial power?

reply
> displacing the advantages of unearned social or financial power

In what way? Sure looks like pay to win to me.

reply
if you're stupid then this technology just amplifies your stupidity which means you can fail faster. I also think the inverse is true.
reply
Success has nothing to do with intelligence. Similarly failing has nothing to do with stupidity.
reply
sure, but now if you're running an entire agentic run for an org, what's to stop you just replacing the org? Previously you didn't have the wodge to pay for all the devs.
reply
I sincerely hope you are right.
reply
It might be copium, but the only guaranteed thing that happens is change.

Remember its coming up millenilal time now and i have hope in this gen.

reply