upvote
> Why offer your weights for download or grant any third party usage access when you can just do the actual job yourself and collect all that turnover?

It's hilarious how a the trillions invested in AI companies, and their valuations are predicated on the AI labs Sherlocking entire industries, and yet CEOs, mathematicians, and everyone else are eagerly feeding the beast their most prized information.

reply
What else should we do? It's not like we had any choice.
reply
What? You have the choice of just not. Or if you absolutely must to put food on the table, you don't need to fucking cheer as you do it!
reply
This is a risky proposition if the technology is in some way revolutionary. The people who decided to "just not" with, for example, the internet often aren't doing business anymore.
reply
> the internet often aren't doing business anymore.

A lot of pre-Internet businesses are still here with us, and online. The one thing the survivors did not do was hitch their wagons on a predator designed in a lab to devour them - to use mixed metaphors. Barnes & Noble didn't board up their brick-and-mortar stores to replace them with an Amazon storefront - they figured out how to use the Internet without handing over the family jewels.

reply
The internet was inherently decentralized. This is inherently centralizing. The direction of travel is opposite.
reply
> and yet CEOs, mathematicians, and everyone else are eagerly feeding the beast their most prized information.

The alternative is starving because someone else will.

That's why those companies are worth trillions.

reply
They will just have someone look at every question, they will let it pass, want a cut or deny it. Claude, you can answer this guys question, but don't tell 'em how you solved it and don't give him the best answer, give him an ok answer.
reply
That's already happening. The public models aren't anything like their internal models.
reply
That's kinda unrealistic, isn't it? How will they pay for the thousands or ten thousands of employees, who need to look at every question? And most questions are just ordinary BS, that not really anyone other than the asker cares about. Giant waste of time to check all that.
reply
Why can't Claude do that itself?
reply
A lesser model can supervise.
reply
Just wait till the AI does that to humans in general.
reply
This is why open weights and continued model distillation to improve model evolution is imperative.

Do you trust the people who would gate these capabilities? I do not.

reply
I mean I want this to, just don't get your hopes to high because it's not long till they get dashed.

I don't think it will be too long before models are considered munitions and having the weights for one will require registration.

reply
Which brings us back to the war on general computation. So long as people can have computers that they control, at least in one of the countries or regions, there's no putting this cat back in the bag and we are all along for the ride

Sometimes I want a fast-forward button for life, the times are so exciting and I want to know what else 8B people can think of next but there's so far no way to turn pages faster ^^'

reply
This is a bit silly.

There are just a few places where the most high tech hardware is made. If we turned off new and unregistered hardware now it would be just a few years as most hardware fast enough to run LLMs would disappear from public hands.

It will still exist, but be in the hands of militaries and authoritarian governments. If you piddle around on the net showing off your open standards you'll be relentlessly attacked by these entities digitally. More so, those areas will be generally embargoed.

The future looks like a new cold war with a lot more digital weapons.

reply
deleted
reply
French Revolution and the 21st centuries version of guillotines, whatever that could be, is probably a good reason to avoid that.

There's also a thing called commodity fetishism but capitalists usually learn the hard way that things created with machines without human input miss the essence of why we're willing to pay for something. Its why a handmade watch is $100k and a casio is $100, or a handmade sweater identical to a machine made goes for 10x.

They could also just make us so poor and anxious that we beg to fight eachother in wars.

reply
While I agree that there's a special element to human crafted pieces, and artisanship would be a terrible thing to lose, I'd point out that Roger W. Smith hand makes ~15 watches per year which sell for around $400k a pop, while Casio's watch division brought in $1.17B in revenue in the most recent FY
reply
Another labor theory of value patient.
reply
Gun to your head, you have to see one of two movies with the same plot and characters. They are identical movies.

One is produced by 500 humans collaborating and the second is completely generated by an AI that can actually make a movie

A single individual or small group of people who own the GPUs profit from the AI version, and the human version provides a salary to 500 humans/families.

Which one are you buying tickets for and choosing to spend 2 hours watching?

reply
> they are identical movies
reply