upvote
> But we still have no self driving cars

While I agree with your statement overall, as someone who drives everyday in LA alongside Waymos without anyone inside of them I must disagree with this aspect of it.

reply
A better formulation would be: we don't know if we have self-driving cars.

Because if it became fashionable for pedestrians to wear large green dresses with red balls, and everybody would wear that, we have no idea what the AI would do.

reply
We still have no general self driving cars. What we have is a bunch of geofenced tests. While we are closer than ever, we are still seemingly a long way away from truck drivers being obsolete was foretold over 10 years ago now.
reply
“General” would mean winter driving and I’m not aware of any large-scale tests of things like icy conditions on hills.

Edit: nevermind. https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/waymo-toronto-winter-self-d...

reply
An LLM automating web developers with 99% success rate saves the company millions of dollars and allows them to launch products and features faster.

A truck or a car that has a 99% success rate would be the top threat to society and quickly rise to the leading cause of death under 30 if widely deployed.

reply
“99% success” is too vague to be especially meaningful in such different use cases.

99% successful web development where the 1% missing is security that and the company leaks its entire repository of user data every few months is not good.

99% successful car driving where 99% of 5-year periods have zero accidents per car is an order of magnitude safer than the average driver. (And gut feeling, I suspect approaching the tail-end of the safest drivers on the road.)

reply
An LLM automating web developers basically puts the company out of business. Why would customers pay a developer when they can just build it themselves?
reply
>quickly rise to the leading cause of death under 30 if widely deployed.

Wait, aren't human-driven cars already the leading cause of death under 30?

reply
Examples?
reply
the point was that 99% rate of success is good enough when failure means nothing, not so much when it means dead people.
reply
Driving is heavily regulated, and there are a million interest groups lining up to sue to stop self-driving. Imagine all the people who make their money from car crashes, for example.
reply
deleted
reply
It seems fairer to say that the Waymo fleet has >4,000 driverless cars [1]. There is still a long way to go, but it's rising.

[1] https://pages.skybrian.com/2026/waymo-robotaxi-fleet/

reply
The physical world is still more difficult and messy than discrete logic (theorems, software).
reply
> But we still have no self driving cars.

Do you live under a rock?

reply
0 self driving cars in my country
reply
There are no elephants in my country, they must not exist.
reply
Uh, they aren’t trustworthy and they aren’t fully autonomous. So no, we indeed do not.
reply
Yeah, as always in AI hard things are easy and easy things are hard. How many times have I heard condescending comments from programmers that radiologists are just about to be replaced by AI. And well, AI turned out to get kind of okayish at programming much faster than being acceptable at being radiologist.
reply
> folks used to focus on how automation would first come for blue collar work

Developers are guilty of hubris and they are getting slapped back to reality.

reply
Developers are guilty of making reasonable projections based on contemporary industry trends, and they're getting slapped by unexpected revolution in computer science.
reply
Driving is actually regulated.

Something I'm noticing a lot is that automation finds easy footholds in unregulated industries because there's no basis to push back on it. And there's a lot more tolerance for poor quality work in unregulated industries too.

reply
I have a self driving Tesla, as do many others.
reply
(Supervised)
reply
Broadly speaking, this is proof that there will be no jobs coming after AI.

All past inventions have put some of the most miserable humans out of a job. Farming by hand is hard, so is copying books and don't even get me started on the dullness of making clothes by hand.

Driving all day isn't all that far off, though still much better than the above and definitely better than riding horses all day.

Telegraph operators? Hell no. Dude sitting in an elevator all day? No thanks.

It's always been from the other end. This time around, there's gonna be some 10-20 years of robot manufacturing, then a universal lifetime of robots fighting misaligned robots until enough paperclips have been manufactured.

Or you know, we block out the sun and live in caves or whatever you fancy.

reply