Inasmuch as you’re reading translations upon translations, sure. But none of that is necessary.

(One could credibly argue that engaging with an LLM is engaging with, in a sense, its training corpus.)

> If you read the Odyssey and decide it was actually about Pokemon, you're misreading it

If you can stand by your reading based on the text, I say go for it. It doesn’t work in your example. But there are plenty of cases where what was once an against-the-grain interpretation dived into and out of the mainstream.