upvote
If you follow that trail far enough it's whoever designed cryptocurrency, right? Because banks can and do reverse transactions as last resort.
reply
No, because this is explicitly the design of Bitcoin. If you give me a foo machine but it makes a bar, that's your fault. If you give me a foo machine and the foo hurts me, that's my fault.
reply
lol I guess you just settled a hundred years of product liability jurisprudence
reply
Bitcoin isn't a product.
reply
Agreed.

Bitcoin isn't a store of value (its too volatile), it isn't a currency (too slow and expensive for small transactions), and it isn't even a product in its own right.

reply
- You can use it as a store of value. - You can make transactions.

If you don’t like it or think it’s too slow doesn’t change these facts.

I agree that it’s not a product though. It is a distributed system that nobody owns.

reply
My point is thdt your aren't really storing value when price is highly volatile, you're gambling. If I put $100 into a store of value, it would continue to be worth $100. If I put $100 in and it may be $30 or $300 later, that isn't value stored.

And yes you can functionally make transactions, but based on current transaction fees it looks like I'd pay $0.22 in fees so I could wait 10-20 minutes for a transaction to likely clear. I'm not doing that at a gas pump, grocery store, etc.

reply
Isn't store of value something that keeps up with inflation? I put 100$ today, which can buy X, in 20 years I can still buy X with that, while 100$ can buy just X/2.

Otherwise I just use the dollar bill as the store of value

reply
Broken by design?
reply
reply
Yep exactly. Broken from design stage. So that engineer were talking about is... Satoshi!?
reply
not such a genius after all /s
reply
Banks can't reverse wire transfers. Unless there is some super-level intervention that is very rarely used. But they can trace where it went.
reply
This kind of low bar reminds me of FTX
reply
Did they get enough time to design and test in properly?
reply