upvote
They more than likely will not answer or will dodge the question entirely. This is so ubiquitous that if you decided to only go through processes that do answer this question, you might not get anything at all. In many cases when they do answer, it is a bold lie; and if challenged "who told you that range?", "well if you hit certain performance parameters by year three your total package may be x...", "that's for the senior position, we are offering you the standard position".
reply
Do your due diligence and research companies that behave in this manner via platforms like Glassdoor. AI makes this process much easier. And always publicly call out companies that do this instead of sucking up.
reply
If they don't answer, then you call off the interview.
reply
You will basically have to be willing to walk away to get an answer other than "tell me what you're looking for and we'll let you know if you're in our range", which basically loses the negotiation. Most people are not comfortable doing that.

Also, large parts of the UK culturally have difficulty talking about money. (Exceptions are Yorkshire, which is proud of it's difference here, and (parts of?) Scotland). That's not going to change overnight, so making disclosure a legal requirement is a fair solution.

reply
I'm in the UK and always ask about salary range and if the role is remote before I agree to do an initial interview. It saves everyone involved from having their time wasted. The first contact is usually a recruiter though, I don't mention pay and benefits in interviews.

It isn't uncommon to be given an acceptable figure, go through several rounds of interviews and end up with job offer but with a lower salary than initially agreed because the recruiter padded the numbers.

reply
> You will basically have to be willing to walk away to get an answer other than "tell me what you're looking for and we'll let you know if you're in our range", which basically loses the negotiation.

No, it doesn't lose the negotiation. What makes you think so? Setting anchors and controlling the document is very powerful.

But yes, you need to know what you can get, and you need to be able and willing to walk away.

reply
They're already anchored, because they know what everyone else is making. You won't kick them loose unless they are teeny tiny. The advice in this thread is basically straight from the patio11 blog post.
reply
Yeah, that part of the blog post ain't that great.

> They're already anchored, because they know what everyone else is making.

Different people make different amounts of money.

reply
The suggestion that it's OP's/the candidate's fault jarred me a little. In my experience this is such a common situation in the UK that you could be jobless for much longer if you insist on early salary disclosure.
reply
Yeah, weird, I’d say? Even in Japan salary range talks come up during the first call. Or in intro emails.
reply
because you ask for their range, but you don't tell them your range.
reply
From GP:

> I'm looking for $120K to $130K. Before we get further into the process I want to confirm that this salary range is what would be discussed if we get to an offer.

reply
yes, never tell them what you are looking for until you know what they are offering and are ready to reject the offer.
reply
Why not?
reply
If you tell them what you are looking for, if they are honest, can say no or short-change you.

Or they can just lie and say yeah we cover that.

If you ask for their range, if they are honest, provide their range.

If dishonest, now they have to provide a range which is within the range you are looking for, and is probably more difficult to gauge.

I find it easier to lie on a yes or no question, than a question of quantity.

But in the end, if you provide a quote, they may save themselves money if you value yourself below market.

reply
Why not?
reply