upvote
>The postal union is against this, usps management is against this, and business mailers are for it

I was confused by this until I realized you are missing some logical steps in your (accurate) argument.

The 2006 law took away the safety net (ie the ability to charge whatever is needed to break even).

The “you can now make a profit” rule actually made it HARDER since it came with a price cap.

It told the USPS: You can keep any profits you make, but you cannot raise prices above the rate of inflation to get them.

This forced the USPS to absorb rising costs through internal efficiency rather than passing the bill to mailers

reply
Yes, thats exactly right. The ability to profit was granted and they were kneecapped by the price cap. They haven't profited since the legislation and immediately started incurring large losses. That's all in my comment already.

By no means was I implying that the ability to profit means they did profit. Im just stating what the law was.

reply
I didn't know what your point was either..
reply
Yes, it's the price cap which is the issue.
reply
In 2006 a law was passed requiring the USPS to fund pensions far in advance, a requirement no other business had, which instantly put them deep in the red. This wasn't fixed until 2022. But it was just this phony accounting that messed them up, more than the other factors you mention.
reply
>In 2006 a law was passed requiring the USPS to fund pensions far in advance, a requirement no other business had, which instantly put them deep in the red. This wasn't fixed until 2022.

No because they are still deep in the red, about $9B a year.

reply
That’s $2B less than the first six days of the Iran war ($11B). We could just cut a check each year from the general fund. It’s a paperwork issue. The fact that we can spend $100B+ on an illegitimate conflict on a whim while costs like this are bikeshedded over boggles my mind.

US Military costs ~$1T/year and the Pentagon hasn’t passed an audit in the last eight years, comparatively, but not a lot of similar complaints of that waste versus pensions for workers operating and serving a national public service agency.

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2025/12...

Electrifying the USPS light vehicle fleet is expected to generate up to $4.3B in lifetime savings over the fleet lifecycle, similarly.

https://huffman.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/electrify...

https://atlaspolicy.com/federal-fleet-electrification-assess...

reply
Additional follow on thought:

USPS and the US military are both, at their heart, logistics engines and systems, and both should be valued as such. "The whole is more than the sum of its parts." If you do not maintain and treat said systems with respect, the capability will not be ready when you need it, or will not contribute to the ongoing success of the jurisdiction in which it operates. The only difference between the two is that the US military happens to fight wars with what its logistics operation it provides itself.

The unsung role of logistics in the US military - https://news.mit.edu/2025/unsung-role-logistics-us-military-... - November 25, 2025

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_logistics

reply
>a requirement no other business

True, but isn't this because everyone knows that USPS is a dying business already?

reply
It's not a business; it's an independent agency of the executive branch. The persistent attempts to view it as a business are a category error and the difference between public and private sectors.
reply
Some would say it’s the unfunded pensions that are the phony accounting
reply
No one else had to set aside money 75 years in advance, for a debt not due for 75 years. That's not legitimate accounting.
reply
Yes. Organizations must fund pensions up front and not rely on future revenue to make up for shortfalls.

It’s weird how people bring this up. It was very unusual for the usps not to have to set aside money now to pay for pensions in the future.

reply
"Contrary to statements made by some employee groups and other stakeholders, PAEA did not require USPS to prefund 75 years of retiree health benefits" https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-13-112.pdf

Also the 2022 Postal Service Reform Act eliminated the prefunding and ~$57 billion of overdue payments, but USPS finances were still dogshit afterwards: USPS revenue was $80 billion and expenses were $89 billion in FY2024

reply
deleted
reply
I don’t think of their finances as being dogshit because there aren’t revenue positive. It’s a fraction of a sliver of the federal budget to run a constitutionally mandated service.

The (non-navy) military has no constitutional mandate at all, it’s an industrial scale cash incineration device which the postal service can’t hold a candle to, and we don’t blink at it wasting 10x or more of the postal service’s opex.

reply
Would you allow other companies to deliver letters and to deliver stuff inside mailboxes? I find it disgusting that a company with a monopoly on those two services still can't make a profit.
reply
It can’t make profit because USPS is not allowed to set the prices of its services.
reply
Someone just bringing whatever shit they want to my house? Junkmail needs to be deregulated? Everytime I hear the "notions" of the libertarian/hypercapitalist ilk it just sounds like "What if your life could be even shittier than it is now?!?"
reply
It would be great to raise prices on spam business mailers without raising prices on normal people
reply
They sort of do this by having the spam business mailers package/submit in ways which cost USPS less to deliver, and the discount is less than the savings. Also covers fixed costs due to volume, which is important due to universal service obligation.

(I have all my mail sent to a CMRA and basically never see any of this stuff, though.)

reply
Totally. It's 90% of the mail. It's junk.
reply
[dead]
reply
> So this attitude that they should just lose a bunch of money and be backstopped by the taxpayer, when mail is less critical than ever, is an entirely new idea and is aligned with business mailer lobbying interests.

Not when combined with the idea that spam mail senders should be legislated out of legality.

reply
If USPS could set whatever price they wanted on business mailers they could completely price them out or make them pay more for it.
reply
The problem is that there are categories of spammers willing to pay more than what the poorest regular people can afford. Much more reasonable to make junk mail illegal just like other countries already have.
reply
> when mail is less critical than ever,

People receive tons of mail, it's just packages. The USPS handles packages, but we've allowed it to be replaced by labor-unfriendly private organizations like UPS and Amazon.

> is an recent idea

> This isn't really accurate. USPS had a break even (not profitability) legal mandate since 1970-2006.

No, the idea that USPS should break even is a recent idea. 1970 is recent.

reply