upvote
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2121648438144024943

booster was low on fuel, plus no mood of risking tower with boom, boosters are cheaper than towers.

reply
Cool. And people thought he wrote this himself!
reply
Such Elon rage! I love the downvotes. Always worth it.
reply
Slight underperformance in the engines resulted in the the booster not reaching where it was supposed to be and the GNC systems automatically aborted to the gulf for safety.
reply
Two reasons floating around. 1.)They lost communication with tower 2.)They ran out of fuel for safe land.

source: Scott Manley https://youtube.com/shorts/m2oGDCvDmdE?si=0AlX8sgHDihXCED6

reply
Do we know what sea life just died as the booster exploded? What are the impacts to the Texas Gulf when a booster detonates into the ocean?
reply
Probably next to nothing compared to what we fish out of the ocean constantly.
reply
idk, i'll take a look after i finish eating my steak dinner
reply
"Slightly low on fuel."

If I understand correctly, the margin was tight enough not to take the risk of damaging the tower.

reply
They need another cheaper tower just for catching. Much less mass when landing.
reply
The existing towers can only handle empty ships & boosters. The tower stacks them, then they’re fueled. A catch-only tower would avoid some cladding and the propellant loading lines, but it would still need a deluge system and a QD arm to replace any remaining propellant with inert gas. At that point you might as well pay a little more and get a fully capable tower.
reply
And if the landing footage is any indication, it sure looks like they would have made the catch anyway if they'd gone for it.
reply
landing footage shows exactly why they didn't attempt the tower catch - the final braking burn was engine rich (green tint), it didn't blow up, but there was a respectable chance of it just crashing into the tower running on less than fumes
reply
I'm not sure thats the case. the booster hovered for what seemed a lot longer than prior booster landing attempts. Almost like they were purposely running out the fuel.
reply
The goal, as I understand it, is to return the booster with as little fuel as possible at time of catch -- and not run short.

The booster footage indicated to me that its engines turned off, and then the body of the booster imploded, before it touched the ground and then became the expected fireball.

I'm definitely not a rocket scientist, but this series of events leads me to believe that the fuel was absolutely exhausted.

reply
Sounds like the final boom was intentional from control
reply
Perhaps it was, and if so: It occurred subsequent to the implosion.

(In case that distinction is missed, I do mean "implode" as the antonym of "explode".)

reply
Their risk tolerance would probably be greater if both towers were fully operational. But any damage to the only functional tower during booster catch = an automatic abort to the ship catch one day later, and the ship catch is what was really interesting at this point of development.
reply
The previz imagery of their plans for the Louisiana coast showed pairs of towers dotting the coast. At first I thought they were for alternating the cadence of launches, but now I wonder if one is to catch the booster and the other to catch ship.
reply
Apparently the booster signaled it didn't have enough fuel to risk it. Either because it consumed more then expected on the way up, or a measurement error potentially.
reply
At the last moment the exhaust turned green. That's consistent with the fuel running out, the engines running oxygen rich, and subsequently "engine rich". So I would put my money on actually running out vs a measurement error.
reply
I heard somewhere the engine efficiency is still somewhat variable so they burned more fuel than anticipated.
reply
That's basically what Musk said, yes: that they need to work on both engine performance and performance consistency. He said they'd be cutting off the main engines one second sooner to provide more margin for boost-back.

Amazing that a one-second difference can matter, but those things go through tons of fuel every one of those seconds!

reply