upvote

points

by roegerle11 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby dotancohen10 hours ago|
next
[-]
They didn't. I haven't bought a Metallica album since the black album. That was a decade earlier, because everything since sucked, but as I got older I thought about maybe expanding my tastes. I avoided Metallica specifically for their disrespect of their fans.
reply
upvoteby DaSHacka7 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Did they not? Seems like they're still quite popular, and I knew people in HS (for reference, late 2010s to early '20s) that were big into the band.

Additionally, looking at Google Trends[0], it seems they peaked in 21st-century online popularity in 2008 and had another notable uptick in 2017.

I think a lot of us want the assholes to have suffered real consequences for their behavior, but want is different from did.

[0] https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=%...

reply
upvoteby to11mtm4 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
I think they've got some ineffable qualities, and frankly there's lots of other genres where people might decide to give them a listen...

Which is really just a roundabout way of saying I think Apocalyptica did a lot to help refresh them in the modern zeitgeist (Yes I know it was older, but I remember youtube videos causing it to enter at least my and other's conscious space...)

reply
upvoteby petre6 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Yeah, they're popular like Ariana Grande is after the Manchester bombing. But just about everything they released after the Black album is kind of lame. The Budapest tickets sold out pretty fast, but they're still lame regardless if people go to their concerts. Compared to Depeche Mode and other bands that only get better with age, Metallica just play the same old songs or worse. And they're not a cult band like Death or The Sisters of Mercy either.
reply
upvoteby DiskoHexyl5 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
But they kind of are (a cult band). Most people in the world know Metalica while hardly anyone ever heard any of the Sisters Of Mercy's tracks.

Normal people don't care- they just enjoy a ballad or two.

I've long since learnt to separate an artist from their art- a fair share of the musicians, actors, directors etc aren't really a decent bunch

reply
upvoteby petre4 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Not really, they missed that chance when they released Load and Reload and who knows what they did after that. I got fed up with their foray into commercial music and moved on to prog metal and other more interesting stuff. If they had stopped after the black album or continued to release quality works, then things would be different, but they chose money, whining, lawyers and drunk teenagers as an audience. They became lame and popular, which excludes being a cult band. Cult bands are not very popular in fact, as you have yourself pointed out.
reply
upvoteby brunoborges7 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
You clearly haven't watched Stranger Things
reply
upvoteby Arubis5 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
Most of their fans didn't know and probably still don't. In my admittedly limited exposure (N=3 or 4), folks I know that were informed on Metallica's behavior in the Napster age that have since purchased anything from Metallica is zero.
reply
upvoteby iririririr9 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
[flagged]
reply
upvoteby coreyburnsdev8 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
one of their best songs is "don't tread on me"
reply
upvoteby budsniffer95o9 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Why are all forums inundated with this ridiculous nonsense? They are "MAGA"? How so? Are people who follow MAGA typically anti-piracy or something? Bizarre.
reply
upvoteby throw109208 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
It [calling anything you don't like "maga"] is political in-group signalling of a tribal ideology that also serves the dual purpose of destroying the meaning of language. Categorically inappropriate for HN - flag it and move on.
reply
upvoteby amanaplanacanal7 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Similar to the way people use "woke".
reply
upvoteby fc417fc8023 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Quite similar. I guess serving largely the same purpose that "alt-right" used to.

However it's important to note that "woke" at least has legitimate (if politically contentious) meaning outside of its broad misuse as a sort of slur. The other two terms don't have that AFAIK.

The case of "maga" specifically strikes me as a spiteful attempt to misappropriate the descriptor (vaguely similar to winnie the pooh) whereas the rise of the other two seems organic.

reply
upvoteby throw109206 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Yup, exactly.
reply
upvoteby mindslight6 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Or it's just going to be a generic term for play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Surely in a thread like this we can acknowledge the futility of things like Xerox trying to maintain their strict definition of the word xerox.
reply
upvoteby garyfirestorm8 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
The ideology has an inherent toxicity to it, along with a self own, doubling down on mistakes that would harm you and the others in longer run, embracing silly ideas and a general disregard for niceties. Would have been nice if they didn’t hurt their own fans like that could be simply phrased as ‘being MAGA’
reply